Confluence logo
Productivity & Collaboration
Confluence

Official source research

Shared documents and knowledge for collaborative teams

Atlassian Confluence: Features, Uses, and Pricing

Confluence helps teams create, organize, and maintain shared documents and knowledge, keeping important information accessible across everyday work and distributed departments reliably over time.

Best forTeams managing collaborative documentation and shared knowledge
Starts from$5.42/mo
Free plan available Web-based SaaS Productivity & Collaboration
Platform overview Confluence
atlassian confluence
Starting price $5.42/mo
Free option Yes
Platform Web-based SaaS
Research level Official source research
Last verified October 2026

Overview

Atlassian Confluence is collaborative workspace software for creating, organizing, sharing, and maintaining team knowledge. It gives organizations a common place for documentation, reference material, plans, and other information that people need to revisit. The practical answer to “what is Confluence used for?” ranges from building an internal knowledge base to documenting processes and decisions. Prospective users typically include team leads, contributors, readers, and administrators evaluating how shared information should be structured and governed. This page focuses on the core Confluence software rather than Atlassian’s broader product suite. In particular, Jira manages work and issue tracking, while Confluence centers on documents and organizational knowledge, although the two products can connect.

How teams create and maintain knowledge in Confluence

A useful Confluence workspace begins with a purpose and a structure. Contributors can create pages, live docs, whiteboards, databases, videos, and slides, then group related material into spaces and page trees. Templates can give recurring documents a consistent starting point, while databases provide more structure when information needs defined fields rather than a purely narrative page.

The structure matters after publication. A team can assign spaces to departments, products, projects, or enduring business functions, but it should decide that convention before the workspace grows. Clear page names, predictable parent pages, and limited duplication make information easier to find through navigation and search. Without those conventions, a capable search system can still return several plausible versions of the same policy or procedure.

Maintenance is a separate stage of the lifecycle. Version history preserves earlier page states, while status markers, archiving, content insights, audit logs, and automation can support review and cleanup processes. These mechanisms do not decide which page remains authoritative or when a subject-matter expert should review it. Teams still need owners, review intervals, and a defined method for marking obsolete material. For high-value documentation, an owner can periodically confirm accuracy, update the status, and archive superseded pages instead of leaving competing versions visible.

Rovo capabilities on eligible plans add AI-assisted search, chat, agents, summaries, and drafting. Their practical role is to help people retrieve or develop material from connected knowledge, not to replace access controls or human verification. Organizations should still review generated content before treating it as an approved policy, instruction, or record.

How collaboration, permissions, and administration work

Confluence separates content participation from workspace governance. Contributors can develop material together and readers can consume it, while administrators determine broader access and organizational settings. Paid plans can manage access at page and space level and support guests, public links, and anonymous access. A guest is restricted to one space, making that role more suitable for a narrowly defined external collaboration than for access across an entire internal knowledge base.

Public and anonymous sharing require deliberate policies. Anonymous access exposes content to anyone on the internet, so it is materially different from inviting an identified guest or sharing within an organization. Administrators should define which spaces may be public, who can change access, and what review is required before publication. Anonymous access is not available on the Free plan or in Atlassian Government Cloud.

Plan selection affects how much control administrators have. The Free plan allows up to 10 users but does not provide customizable permissions, so its shared editable model may be too broad for teams handling information with different access requirements. Larger installations also need to account for storage, site scale, support, auditing, and centralized administration rather than treating user count as the only decision factor.

The Confluence tool can enforce configured permissions and retain operational records, but it cannot create a sensible information architecture on its own. Administrators and content owners must establish naming conventions, space boundaries, ownership, review routines, and offboarding procedures. They should also test guest and public access with representative accounts instead of assuming that inherited or page-level settings produce the intended result.

Moving existing knowledge into or out of Confluence

Confluence Cloud documents import paths for Microsoft Word, Google Docs, and OneDrive documents. That gives teams several starting points for consolidating existing knowledge, but an import should be treated as a conversion rather than a guaranteed visual copy. Unsupported formatting or images may not survive intact, so teams should test representative files containing tables, embedded media, links, comments, and complex layouts before scheduling a larger move.

A migration plan should distinguish page content from the surrounding system. Attachments, permissions, page relationships, structured databases, and whiteboards may require different checks. In particular, importing a Confluence Cloud space does not retain whiteboard or database functionality. Teams should inventory those content types separately and decide whether they need rebuilding, another transfer method, or an archived reference copy.

For outbound portability, documented exports include Word, PDF, HTML, CSV, and XML, but format availability and the resulting structure depend on the content being exported. A PDF may suit a stable reading copy, while HTML or XML may be more relevant to a structured migration. CSV is associated with tabular data rather than a complete recreation of a space. Before committing to a format, administrators should export a small but representative set and verify text, attachments, hierarchy, links, permissions, and any data that must remain editable.

Deployment also shapes the migration process. Confluence is available as a cloud service and as the self-managed Data Center product, so teams should confirm which source and destination documentation applies to their environment. A staged transfer with a defined content freeze, validation checklist, owner sign-off, and fallback copy reduces the chance of losing context while pages are moved.

Key features

Flexible content creation

Create and collaborate on pages, live docs, whiteboards, databases, videos, and slides within a shared workspace.

Spaces and page trees

Group related knowledge in spaces and arrange pages hierarchically, with templates and databases supporting repeatable structures.

Connected knowledge search

Search organizational knowledge, with eligible Rovo capabilities adding AI search, chat, summaries, agents, and drafting.

Controlled sharing

Paid plans support page, space, guest, public-link, and anonymous access controls for different sharing situations.

Knowledge maintenance tools

Use versioning, archives, status markers, content insights, audit logs, and automation to support review and maintenance.

Document import and export

Import supported Word, Google Docs, and OneDrive documents and export content in Word, PDF, HTML, CSV, or XML formats.

Collaborative editing

Contributors can develop shared material together while readers, guests, and administrators participate according to configured access.

Best use cases

01

Internal knowledge bases

Centralize policies, reference material, onboarding guidance, and answers that employees need to find repeatedly.

02

Process documentation

Record operating procedures, responsibilities, decisions, and updates in structured pages with visible revision history.

03

Project and team documentation

Keep plans, requirements, meeting notes, research, and supporting context together without using Confluence as the primary task tracker.

04

Controlled external collaboration

Share a defined space or selected public material with guests and outside readers when the plan and access configuration support it.

Pricing

USD figures reflect inspected United States Confluence Cloud pricing. Monthly billing uses the exact user count, while annual billing uses user tiers. Taxes may apply. Data Center is self-managed and is not represented by these Cloud plan prices.

Free

$0
Free forever.
Up to 10 users, 2 GB storage, community support, shared editable access, and no customizable permissions or anonymous access. Inactive sites may be deactivated.
Check current plan ↗

Pricing last verified 21 October 2026.

Important limitations

  • Restricted Free plan controls. The Free plan is limited to 10 users and 2 GB of storage, uses shared editable access, and lacks customizable permissions and anonymous access.
  • Partial offline operation. Offline editing applies to previously opened content. Users cannot create new content or use network-dependent features, and offline data may be cleared after 30 days.
  • Imperfect import fidelity. Imported material may lose formatting or unsupported images, and Cloud space imports do not preserve whiteboard or database functionality.
  • Narrow guest access. Each guest can access only one space, which can complicate external collaboration spanning several knowledge areas.

Who Confluence is best for

Confluence suits teams that need a shared, searchable system for collaborative documentation and organizational knowledge. It is strongest when administrators and content owners can define spaces, access rules, and maintenance routines. The confluence application is less suitable for users seeking a purely local notes tool or a dedicated system for assigning and tracking project work.

Pros and cons

Advantages

  • Supports several content formats within one organized knowledge workspace.
  • Combines hierarchical organization, search, versioning, and archiving for long-lived documentation.
  • Provides multiple sharing models for internal, guest, public-link, and anonymous access on supported paid plans.
  • Offers documented import and export paths for common document and migration workflows.

Tradeoffs

  • The Free plan lacks customizable permissions and anonymous access and is capped at 10 users and 2 GB.
  • Guests are restricted to one space each, limiting broader external collaboration.
  • Offline mode cannot create new content or use features that require a network connection.
  • Imports can lose formatting, images, or functional content types such as whiteboards and databases.

Works with

Jira Loom Slack Microsoft Teams Google Drive OneDrive

Is Confluence the right choice?

Confluence is a strong fit for organizations that want collaborative documentation to function as a maintained knowledge system rather than a loose collection of files. Its value increases when teams need common structures, searchable context, controlled sharing, and a record of how important material changes. It can also sit alongside Jira without requiring the documentation workspace to become a task tracker.

The principal trade-off is governance. The Confluence application supplies structure, permissions, history, and maintenance mechanisms, but teams must still define ownership, naming, review schedules, and public-sharing policies. Free-plan controls may be too limited for sensitive or segmented knowledge, while guests and offline users face practical restrictions. Confluence is therefore best for teams prepared to manage their knowledge base deliberately; groups wanting local-first notes, unrestricted offline creation, or project execution as the primary workflow should consider a more specialized tool.

Based on official documentation and pricing, not hands-on testing